<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A month of Django</title>
	<link>http://www.ivixor.net/2008/04/10/a-month-of-django/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 10:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: dan</title>
		<link>http://www.ivixor.net/2008/04/10/a-month-of-django/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 23:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ivixor.net/2008/04/10/a-month-of-django/#comment-38</guid>
		<description>Matt - I didn't &lt;strong&gt;have&lt;/strong&gt; to import the model into an external script. but I thought I might as well try and use the ORM niceness. This is a script that is (currently)  run manually to parse log files. 

Re the ORM needing work - probably, I have no idea since I've only played with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt - I didn&#8217;t <strong>have</strong> to import the model into an external script. but I thought I might as well try and use the ORM niceness. This is a script that is (currently)  run manually to parse log files. </p>
<p>Re the ORM needing work - probably, I have no idea since I&#8217;ve only played with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Russell</title>
		<link>http://www.ivixor.net/2008/04/10/a-month-of-django/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 23:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ivixor.net/2008/04/10/a-month-of-django/#comment-37</guid>
		<description>Nice article.
I'm still not a fan of the templating, but for some uses it's cool.  I'm interested why, you had to import the db from an external script as you mention in 'Flexibility'?
As for the python community uniteing behind django, as you say, I think this is already happening.  
I do think that the ORM needs a bit more work  - since you have to adjust your db schema to accomodate for lazy loading concerns.  There is some work going on to intergrate sqlalchemy into django (as an optional ORM), which would be sweet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article.<br />
I&#8217;m still not a fan of the templating, but for some uses it&#8217;s cool.  I&#8217;m interested why, you had to import the db from an external script as you mention in &#8216;Flexibility&#8217;?<br />
As for the python community uniteing behind django, as you say, I think this is already happening. <br />
I do think that the ORM needs a bit more work  - since you have to adjust your db schema to accomodate for lazy loading concerns.  There is some work going on to intergrate sqlalchemy into django (as an optional ORM), which would be sweet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
